Let's not look very far. How many people on this forum has accepted the ruling as fair. You, and perhaps Suparco (I'm not sure how he feels yet)?
The ruling was just in the sense they didn't want to derail the 'democratic' process, country without PM, chaos, parliamentary re-elections, then the person who vacated his seat their re-election, expenses, deal with NATO, deal with Taliban, PA, etc. The ruling was very biased.
There are people who have been given a longer time-out for the same contempt of court; The judgement was hardly fair.
However, compared to 'punishment' received by NS, SS, Babar Awan for contempt of court, this was a land mark decision.
Edited by Shehz, 28 April 2012 - 07:14 AM.