So here are the questions which I wanted to add in the poll:
1b) EF2000 looks better than J-10
2a) J-10 is technological equilavent to EF2000
2b) EF-2000 is better than J-10 in every aspect
3a) Single jetengines are easier to maintain and cheaper in expenses, like consuming less jetfuel
3b) Whocares, so long as the taxpayers contribute the flighmissions, let the pilots knock some high and crazy G's out of the birds!
4a) J-10's R&D departments will be able to innovate, calculate and use their imagination to counter the EF-2000, time will come - secondly J-10 plants (China) are not effected by the global financial crisis like the European plants
4b) EF-2000 will undergo innovations and technological developments to let the J-10 fall behind, but is highly effected by the financial crisis - unless rich states such as KSA contributes to their R&D departments' budget
Allright, here is the main reason to why I have decided to open this thread:
Some members on PDF mean the J-10 / Fc-20 is better than the EF-2000, so lets have a fair poll about the two different projects.
Lets put some fair and historical insight on the original the project "Lavi" (now offically called J-10/PAF FC-20) and secondly birth of the Eurofighter.
And for the design, this will tell us which one of them wins for the most sexylooking jetfighter, but does not have an impact on the maneuverbility - nor the main cause of usage to the primary missions which pilots, airforces and the jetfighters need to tackle and save themselves out of in case of air-to-air attacks/air-to-ground attacks/covering great distances
Edited by sobank, 21 February 2009 - 04:02 AM.