Question Thread For Army
- Please log in to reply
#1 sobank
-
- +Senior Moderator
-
- 11,009 posts
GENERAL
- Gender:Male
- Location:Toronto,Canada
Posted 10 June 2006 - 09:16 PM
You are welcome to put any question. For starters in defence, it will be wise to read this thread to get some confusions out of your way and save yourself from other people shouting that it goes in question thread or already answered in question thread.
A guideline
---------------
1- make sure your question is small and precise.
2- dont ask questions for which people may have different opinion e.g. "which tank is better?", though a question like the difference in two tank models is fine.
3-give your text a red color.
4- finally be courteous and a thank you note will be appreciated by the person who is answering your question.
---------------
Mods could you please Pin the topic.
#2 Usman
-
- Full Members
-




- 127 posts
COLONEL
Posted 11 June 2006 - 06:07 AM
#3 GreenBeret
-
- Senior Members
-









- 6,538 posts
GENERAL
- Gender:Male
Posted 11 June 2006 - 06:52 AM
King-6, Bravo is Mission Complete, Send Black window.
#4 sparten
-
- Senior Members
-





- 2,244 posts
BRIGADIER
- Gender:Male
- Location:Islamabad
Posted 11 June 2006 - 07:15 AM
would be smart thread indeed---
How much RPG-7 or RPG-27 effective on modren day tanks, are Tanks like T80UD, AK, Arjun, T-90 could be destory with these weapons?
M1 Tanker answered this question last year. IIRC he said, hat at close range at the backside, an RPG may well kill a tank, even an Abrams As for the Frontal Armour,its unlikely to penetrate, but it will possibly destroy optics, and communication links.
#5 Usman
-
- Full Members
-




- 127 posts
COLONEL
Posted 11 June 2006 - 08:22 AM
What s TOWED Artiallry and Self Propelled Artillary, and which is better?
#6 GreenBeret
-
- Senior Members
-









- 6,538 posts
GENERAL
- Gender:Male
Posted 11 June 2006 - 08:57 AM
Towed Artillery is an artillery gun on 2/4/6 wheels,that needs a truck to be towed by it for transportation.its used in mountain areas or with infantry divisions.
King-6, Bravo is Mission Complete, Send Black window.
#7 faz101
-
- Senior Members
-









- 2,969 posts
GENERAL
- Interests:anything to do with defence or economics....
- Location:UK
Posted 11 June 2006 - 08:57 AM
Towed artillery requires a truck to pull it to where the action is. when in combat it's crew also has less protection. SP artillery is mounted on a tank chassis and gives the crew all the protection a tank offers. it's also a lot more mobile and means that the artillery can keep up with the tanks in a strike formation and provide immediate firepower if neccessary.
hope that helps.
Hermann Göring
#8 GreenBeret
-
- Senior Members
-









- 6,538 posts
GENERAL
- Gender:Male
Posted 11 June 2006 - 09:13 AM
King-6, Bravo is Mission Complete, Send Black window.
#9 Usman
-
- Full Members
-




- 127 posts
COLONEL
Posted 11 June 2006 - 09:19 AM
Let me Find few more Qs
#10 AL-khalid
-
- Senior Members
-









- 2,899 posts
GENERAL
- Gender:Male
Posted 11 June 2006 - 09:20 AM
I also heard that in AK-2 we will be using 120 mm gun; please correct me if i am wrong ! thanks!
Cry you like women over a kingdom (Pakistan) lost which you could not defend like men.
*¤**¤**¤**¤**¤**¤**¤**¤**¤**¤**¤**¤**¤**¤**¤**¤**¤**¤**¤**¤*
Main Jo Sar-ba-sajada Huaa Kabhi, To Zameen Se Aane Lagi Sada
Tera Dil To Hai Sanam Aashanaa, Tujhe Kya Milega Namaaz Mein
Whenever I went into prostration a voice came from the earth
Your heart is in materialism what would you gain from your prayers
#11 faz101
-
- Senior Members
-









- 2,969 posts
GENERAL
- Interests:anything to do with defence or economics....
- Location:UK
Posted 11 June 2006 - 09:31 AM
i wanted to ask; do we make both of these artillery gus in Pakistan ? if yes, what type of artillery guns do we make ?
I also heard that in AK-2 we will be using 120 mm gun; please correct me if i am wrong ! thanks!
i'm sorry again I'm probably only partly answering the question but yes, we do make towed artillery pieces. AFAIK we make all our towed artillery pieces. SP artillery is in the form of US supplied M109s - which we'll be getting more of in the next few months if we haven't already. currently these SP guns are superior to anything else we can field cause they have full computing capability for laying down more accurate firepower.
Hermann Göring
#12 Usman
-
- Full Members
-




- 127 posts
COLONEL
Posted 11 June 2006 - 10:36 AM
#13 GreenBeret
-
- Senior Members
-









- 6,538 posts
GENERAL
- Gender:Male
Posted 11 June 2006 - 11:34 AM
i wanted to ask; do we make both of these artillery gus in Pakistan ? if yes, what type of artillery guns do we make ?
I also heard that in AK-2 we will be using 120 mm gun; please correct me if i am wrong ! thanks!
we dont make any artillery guns in pakistan,not even 105mm piece.we have towed artillery guns from China and USA which are,M114 155mm,M115 8 inch howitzer,M101 105mm howitzer,Type59-1(chinese) 1300mm field gun etc.
We only produce MBRL's 122mm.
We have two types of SP guns,155mm M109A2 and more in this category will be acquired,also 203mm(8 inch)M110A2.
AK2 will be 120mm if Chinese new tank is 120mm,shifting from 125mm to 120mm is not easy.
i read the T-80UD & AK Tanks are specilly for Desert warefare, Then which tank in PA inventory used for terrain in Northren Punjab area bordering Kashmir & Indian Punjab.
We have T69II and T59's also.T69II are upgraded to 105mm L7 british Gun.also T85II with 125mm gun is there but im not sure abt current deployment.
King-6, Bravo is Mission Complete, Send Black window.
#14 sobank
-
- +Senior Moderator
-
- 11,009 posts
GENERAL
- Gender:Male
- Location:Toronto,Canada
Posted 11 June 2006 - 11:42 AM
a cooler engine is always a good thing. The temprature in the areas where one can deploy a tank, is not extreme so ak and 80 both should do well. Terrain requirement is the same as desert one i.e. light and good armor. but some changes might add to increased survivability of the tanks in northern areas. These changes will include a heavier armor for ambush attack protection.
In northern areas tanks are hard to deploy because of increased ambush and complicated terrain. battles are mostly fought on hills so tanks practically are useless.
#15 blain2
-
- Senior Members
-





- 1,931 posts
BRIGADIER
Posted 11 June 2006 - 12:50 PM
i'll answeer the artillery qn.
Towed artillery requires a truck to pull it to where the action is. when in combat it's crew also has less protection. SP artillery is mounted on a tank chassis and gives the crew all the protection a tank offers. it's also a lot more mobile and means that the artillery can keep up with the tanks in a strike formation and provide immediate firepower if neccessary.
hope that helps.
One exception. SP artillery can be both wheeled and tracked. Not neccessary for it to be mounted on tank chassis. French and South Africans have SP artillery mounted on wheeled chasis.
#16 faz101
-
- Senior Members
-









- 2,969 posts
GENERAL
- Interests:anything to do with defence or economics....
- Location:UK
Posted 11 June 2006 - 01:53 PM
I'm slightly confused. I remember reading an army magazine published in 1997 for 50 yrs of independence and it clearly said that we produced some towed artillery in-house. i think the particular artillery gun was called rana or somethnig like that. read it a long time ago so my memory is quite hazy but can you confirm that we don't make any towed artillery in Pakistan?
blain2, yes you are right I forgot to mention that wheeled transport can also be used instead of tank chassis.
Hermann Göring
#17 sparten
-
- Senior Members
-





- 2,244 posts
BRIGADIER
- Gender:Male
- Location:Islamabad
Posted 12 June 2006 - 12:09 AM
about thje 125mm and 120mm gun,search this forum and u will find a very big discussion on it,usually 120mm gun is considered better.
It must be remembered that the AKs 125 mm gun is different from the T-72 gun. ANd it has much better AP qualities.
Even tanky accepted that.
#18 sobank
-
- +Senior Moderator
-
- 11,009 posts
GENERAL
- Gender:Male
- Location:Toronto,Canada
Posted 12 June 2006 - 02:54 AM
i was wondering if we can produce sub-munitions like those in ATACMS(950 base ball sized M74 munitions).
i have no technical knowledge...so please shed more light on it, than i received on my previous questions.
If yes, then we can use them in HATAF-1 and form our own ATACMS....is it possible ?
yes but if we want to have one is another question. First of all we cannot afford to send a ballistic missile with a gernades for anti personal attack. secondly a ballistic missile is very inacurate as compared to an artilary shell and again very expensive one. there are lot more cheaper ways today to deliver this kind of attack. And the day our our missile system becomes so accurate that they can use M74 like munition, we wont need it
#19 GreenBeret
-
- Senior Members
-









- 6,538 posts
GENERAL
- Gender:Male
Posted 12 June 2006 - 07:11 AM
greenberet,
I'm slightly confused. I remember reading an army magazine published in 1997 for 50 yrs of independence and it clearly said that we produced some towed artillery in-house. i think the particular artillery gun was called rana or somethnig like that. read it a long time ago so my memory is quite hazy but can you confirm that we don't make any towed artillery in Pakistan?
Yaar im quite sure we make ammunation for artillery systems but i havent read or heard that me make any calibre of towed artillery guns.
King-6, Bravo is Mission Complete, Send Black window.
#20 Usman
-
- Full Members
-




- 127 posts
COLONEL
Posted 12 June 2006 - 07:42 AM
#21 GreenBeret
-
- Senior Members
-









- 6,538 posts
GENERAL
- Gender:Male
Posted 12 June 2006 - 09:01 AM
About how many tanks are in a Tank Squadren, and approx how many tank squadren are in armoured Birgade?
id make it simple for u and breakdown from brigade to troop formation:
1 armour brigade= 2 tank regiments + 1 mech infantry battalion
1 tank regiment=45 tanks(3 squadrons)
1 squadron=15 tanks(3-4 troop)
1 troop=3-4 tanks
thats for a general idea
King-6, Bravo is Mission Complete, Send Black window.
#22 Usman
-
- Full Members
-




- 127 posts
COLONEL
Posted 12 June 2006 - 09:52 AM
#23 ali23
-
- Senior Members
-





- 2,299 posts
BRIGADIER
- Gender:Male
- Location:RWP,Pakistan
Posted 12 June 2006 - 03:23 PM
#24 sobank
-
- +Senior Moderator
-
- 11,009 posts
GENERAL
- Gender:Male
- Location:Toronto,Canada
Posted 12 June 2006 - 03:41 PM
But they r termed as guided missiles..and HATAF-1 is battlefield range ballistic missile.i remember MAJ. GEN.
Shock-at-sultan saying that the deviation of our ballistic missiles is 0.1%. so for shorter ranges like 80 or 100, its not a big deal
again depends on who we are talking about. Is it possible to do it--yes. is it economical for PA--No.
An HE shell used in our M155 guns have a 50m kill zone. put those on hataf and they are certain death for infantry. Now thats effiecient and economical. and 0.1% deviation wont mean anything cause the kill zone is not depending on if it hits the enemy soldier or not. if you are in 50m, you are dead. most prolly trenches wont save you. which is not the same as in ATacms.
#25 sobank
-
- +Senior Moderator
-
- 11,009 posts
GENERAL
- Gender:Male
- Location:Toronto,Canada
Posted 13 June 2006 - 09:44 AM
sorry to trouble u again and again...but i cannot understand why not ?do u want to say that we can do the same thing with HE shells.?that
You have to understand the working of the two munitions.
ATACMS is practically a big frag grenade. you wont get killed unless you get hit by a projectile released from atacm. to die or get injured by it, you have to get hit by one. on the other hand if you are around the corner and if the blast will kill you or the after effects of the blast cetainly kill you. HE will blow off a building, while the atacm will make wholes in the building. a person might not die because of direct blast of HE if he is inside the building but he will certainly be crippled becuase of building coming to ground.
HE can destroy the armors atacm might not be able to do that. (note the might part.)
#26 pilot_dude
-
- Banned
-







- 929 posts
MAJOR GENERAL
- Location:my utopia
Posted 22 June 2006 - 03:25 AM
AK is made for all terrain performance. generally speaking, if your tank can perform well in desert, it can also perfrom well in northern area.
a cooler engine is always a good thing. The temprature in the areas where one can deploy a tank, is not extreme so ak and 80 both should do well. Terrain requirement is the same as desert one i.e. light and good armor. but some changes might add to increased survivability of the tanks in northern areas. These changes will include a heavier armor for ambush attack protection.
In northern areas tanks are hard to deploy because of increased ambush and complicated terrain. battles are mostly fought on hills so tanks practically are useless.
Dont tank's gt trapped/buried in sandy deserts?
correct me if i am wrong but isnt this what happin in the 1965 war when we entered rajhistan?????
.......,-.______________,=========,
......[|..)_____________)#######((_ \
....../===============..-..___,--".._\
....."-._,__,__[ ..... ]____\.#######/
......................\...(...).)...).#### O##(
........................\..\____/,..#######\
.........................`===="....\#######\
...........................................\#######\
.............................................)##O####|
.............................................)..####__,"
..............................................`..--."."
#27 sobank
-
- +Senior Moderator
-
- 11,009 posts
GENERAL
- Gender:Male
- Location:Toronto,Canada
Posted 22 June 2006 - 07:07 AM
#28 blain2
-
- Senior Members
-





- 1,931 posts
BRIGADIER
Posted 02 July 2006 - 06:52 AM
I heard that G-3s donot work in extremely cold temperatures like Siachen ?????
Yes correct. This is the reason that all units on Siachen are equipped with Type-59s.
#29 Arms for Peace
-
- Banned
-





- 1,189 posts
BRIGADIER
Posted 02 July 2006 - 07:26 AM
#30 Usman
-
- Full Members
-




- 127 posts
COLONEL
Posted 02 July 2006 - 07:43 AM
#31 faz101
-
- Senior Members
-









- 2,969 posts
GENERAL
- Interests:anything to do with defence or economics....
- Location:UK
Posted 02 July 2006 - 10:24 AM
The Soldiers of Infantry Birgate / division are Only uses Small arms like Rifles / Garnades etc. ?
no ont neccessarily. infantry brigades also have recolloiss(sp?) rifles which can be used for infantry support and to knock out tanks etc. they can also have anti-tank weaponary like bhaktar shikan and SAMs like Anza etc. they also have mines (both anti-tank and anti-personnel). using radios they can of course call in air support and artillery support.
i've also personnally known of infantry brigades that in war-time situations can have armour regiments attached to them for close support.
Hermann Göring
#32 sobank
-
- +Senior Moderator
-
- 11,009 posts
GENERAL
- Gender:Male
- Location:Toronto,Canada
Posted 02 July 2006 - 10:58 AM
I thought type 59 are field guns and tanks. anyway please give me a link or just tell me its different model of ak 47 or something.
#33 crazyinsane105
-
- Senior Members
-









- 4,795 posts
GENERAL
- Location:Chicago
Posted 02 July 2006 - 11:56 AM
What's so hard about making artillery, why can't we make them.
It requires a very strong industrialization in steel and other metals. It's something that Pakistan doesn't have at the moment.
#34 Usman
-
- Full Members
-




- 127 posts
COLONEL
Posted 04 July 2006 - 11:26 AM
Whats their operational role?
#35 faz101
-
- Senior Members
-









- 2,969 posts
GENERAL
- Interests:anything to do with defence or economics....
- Location:UK
Posted 04 July 2006 - 03:06 PM
RAPID divisions are just rapidly deployable to the frontline. ties in with their cold start doctrine whereby some divisions would rapidly deploy to the border while other IA formations mobilise to face any threat.
Hermann Göring
#36 sohailbarki
-
- Full Members
-




- 152 posts
COLONEL
- Gender:Male
Posted 05 July 2006 - 10:46 PM
*****Pakistan Zindaabaad***********
#37 sobank
-
- +Senior Moderator
-
- 11,009 posts
GENERAL
- Gender:Male
- Location:Toronto,Canada
Posted 06 July 2006 - 12:03 AM
why pak army not uses that scopes of G3 riples for more accuracy as did by americans and others..also i do not see use of bullet proof jackets..G3 is good for scope purpose it will act like short to medium range sniper..
A good speculative response will be the fact that we are moving away from g3. it has completed its time in army. They have already started its replacement on smaller scale by brining in styre aug, a most ugly and not so reliable gun in my opinion:).
Though deployment of styre aug is still full of doubts. but yes I do agree that we should have given a 2-4x zoom lense to g3.
bullet proof: well cost is big question here. though we are moving toward it soon slowly Inshallah.
#38 GreenBeret
-
- Senior Members
-









- 6,538 posts
GENERAL
- Gender:Male
Posted 08 July 2006 - 04:25 AM
On this forum i ready the thread regarding the formation of Pak Army, where in IA structure the terms of RAPID DIVISIONS & MOUNTAIN DIVISION are mentioned.
Whats their operational role?
RAPID divisions are actually half-mechanized divisions.
Mountain divisions are like infantry divisions without armour support and only deployed in kashmir like mountaineous terrain.
King-6, Bravo is Mission Complete, Send Black window.
#39 sohailbarki
-
- Full Members
-




- 152 posts
COLONEL
- Gender:Male
Posted 08 July 2006 - 11:59 AM
what is styre aug. is G3 is replacing by it if u have any pics or source so share it..
*****Pakistan Zindaabaad***********
#40 sparten
-
- Senior Members
-





- 2,244 posts
BRIGADIER
- Gender:Male
- Location:Islamabad
Posted 09 July 2006 - 01:15 AM
will how much cast one jacket did.. indian army is using them in kashmir if u see television and kashmir shots u will see them wearing..while pakistan exports (i hear) why not use them extensively..it is not a bad to save ur man from in coming bullets and ur casualties figures get high and rise the moral of ur enemy..
what is styre aug. is G3 is replacing by it if u have any pics or source so share it..
For the 100th time, we have been using vests for 2 decades. They are used according to doctrine of the particular nation, we use them mostly when we are on internal security ops such as WANA. Look at pic from the 80's or early 90's in Karachi, they wear them as well. Jackets are heavy and uncomfortable, and not really useful against MG or even 7.62 mm rounds, thus they are not used in combat operations such as such, since they can actually reduce mobility, which is WAAAAAAAY more dangerous.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Community Forum Software by IP.Board
Licensed to: PakistaniDefence.Com










