Pakistan Air Force Package Options?
-
This topic is locked
#1 Saqr
-
- Moderator
-
- 17,968 posts
GENERAL
- Gender:Male
- Location:Canada
Posted 28 May 2004 - 09:45 PM
I think the PAF will go for the JAS-39E/F + Eireye + Datalink option as it is the cheapest Western Option (besides used F-16s and E-2s), not to mention the JAS-39E/F version won't host an American Engine and American parts (I think) it's then, a good option, however, the Swedes now get the final word.
#2 zetsui
-
- Banned
-


- 527 posts
CAPTAIN
Posted 28 May 2004 - 10:47 PM
#3 PakShaheen
-
- Senior Members
-









- 3,677 posts
GENERAL
Posted 29 May 2004 - 01:22 AM
========
Please stop building these kind of polls.PAF is not telling anything about procurment.Wait may some thing come in June as per promise made by ACM.
<-*-)( PakShaheen )(-*->
<-*-(( --- *** --- ))-*->
#4 Saad
-
- Senior Members
-





- 1,642 posts
BRIGADIER
- Interests:Military related stuff,material,news,etc.
- Location:Pakistan
Posted 29 May 2004 - 01:39 AM
zetsui, on May 28 2004, 10:47 PM, said:
Men at their best Pakistan Army
As long as we hope tomarrow awaits
"I'll be glad when we are no longer dependent on US aid".
Winston Churchill said in 1954
"Each time Paris was taken during last centuary,French resistance crumbled within an hour".
Charles de Gaulle wrote in 1934
#5 Magnus
-
- +Senior Moderator
-
- 9,543 posts
GENERAL
Posted 29 May 2004 - 01:44 AM
====================================
Too costly .
JAS-39E/F + Eireye AWACS System + Datalink
====================================
1-Costly
2-American Nod to Sweden needed .
3-Swedish policy of checking it will not destroy balance of power in
South East Asia .
J-10 + Chinese A-50 AWACS System
====================================
J-10 - Available but not immediately
Chinese Awacs Programme - Undergoing testing . Far from production
and orders.
F-16A/B MLU + E-2C Hawkeye-2000 AWACS System
====================================
F-16 'Oh GOD no'
Probably F-18 request 'US will not indulge in any sales to disturb
balance'
Hawkeye-2000- 'Maybe Maybe Maybe Maybe Maybe Maybe'
Possibilities
J-10 future procurements with western packages along with American or Swedish options in coming years . If Kerry is president forget the AWACS as well from
the US
- All great ideas are simple. The trick is to see them before others.
- Vegre nem butulok tovabb (Finally I am becoming stupider no more) -the epitaph Paul Erdos wrote for himself
- "speak softly, but carry a big stick" - Chinese proverb
- History shows that there are no invincible armies and that there never have been- Stalin
- "Why does shame and self-loathing become cruelty to the innocent?"- Anne Rice
- “In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity.” Hunter S Thompson
#6 Rahul
-
- Senior Members
-





- 1,193 posts
BRIGADIER
Posted 29 May 2004 - 03:33 AM
USA won,t sell you anything other than Food ie soya beans.
French is just too expensive can,t buy much on $3 billion a year budget.
That leaves J10 frm China which is available post 2008.
As for Awacs .......... Unless China developes one PAF will not get an Awacs ever.
#7 Saqr
-
- Moderator
-
- 17,968 posts
GENERAL
- Gender:Male
- Location:Canada
Posted 29 May 2004 - 08:01 AM
India doesn't have an AWACS either, so don't be soo proud of your self.
PakShaheen, dude, the last poll I made was glitched, it had a mistake on it, this one's correct. I want to see what the PAF will actually do if it only had package options.
Finally, I think the JAS-39E/F + Eireye + Datalink will be chosen as this Gripen uses a European Engine, Radar, and virtually no American components.
#8 Magnus
-
- +Senior Moderator
-
- 9,543 posts
GENERAL
Posted 29 May 2004 - 10:50 AM
European military policy makers are American biatches EXCEPT Germany and France.
France will sell equipment to Pakistan if Pakistanis are ready for
a huge payment PILL that comes with it . Swedish option is too
shaky . Chinese option is time dependent . American option is
like 'never ending wait'
- All great ideas are simple. The trick is to see them before others.
- Vegre nem butulok tovabb (Finally I am becoming stupider no more) -the epitaph Paul Erdos wrote for himself
- "speak softly, but carry a big stick" - Chinese proverb
- History shows that there are no invincible armies and that there never have been- Stalin
- "Why does shame and self-loathing become cruelty to the innocent?"- Anne Rice
- “In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity.” Hunter S Thompson
#9 Saqr
-
- Moderator
-
- 17,968 posts
GENERAL
- Gender:Male
- Location:Canada
Posted 29 May 2004 - 11:05 AM
What would you prefer between the above, remember, the Mirage 2000-9 is a customized Mirage 2000-5Mk2, and it's price can vary from 60mn US Dollars to 75mn US Dollars a piece depending on custom.
#10 mani395
-
- Full Members
-




- 234 posts
COLONEL
#11 jawad2004
-
- Full Members
-



- 623 posts
MAJOR
Posted 29 May 2004 - 08:33 PM
#12 Saqr
-
- Moderator
-
- 17,968 posts
GENERAL
- Gender:Male
- Location:Canada
Posted 29 May 2004 - 08:39 PM
Quote
with eu2000's engine
#13 jawad2004
-
- Full Members
-



- 623 posts
MAJOR
Posted 29 May 2004 - 10:05 PM
It well take time and this is what PAF does not have
They r lookin for aircraft which can be inducted as Soon as possible
Well my search reasults some thing like this
* Features under development for future Gripens include:
An electronically-scanned array (AESA) radar based on the PS-05/A, now being developed by Ericsson. An AESA consists of an array of programmable "transmit-receive (TR)" modules that can operate in parallel to perform separate or collaborative functions, performing, for example, jamming and target acquisition at the same time. The AESA will provide enhanced multimode capabilities, as well as extended range for beyond visual range missiles. It is scheduled for introduction in the 2005:2010 timeframe.
In the long term, SAAB is looking at a new engine, such as the General Electric F414 or a thrust-vectoring version of the EJ200 engine used on the Eurofighter; conformal fuel tanks or a fuselage stretch for greater range; a wide-angle HUD; a binocular helmet-mounted display; a direct voice-command system; and an advanced missions support system.
Saab 2110 Project to meet JAS requirement.
JAS 39 Batch of 5 prototype development aircraft.
JAS 39A Batch 1 Initial production single-seater version. Mark 1 avionics fit: Hughes HUD, monochrome cockpit displays, D80 computer, PP1/PP2 displays processors, three MIL STD 1553B databuses, Microturbo TGA15-090 APU
JAS 39A Batch 2 Follow-on batch of single-seat fighters. Mark 2 avionics fit: Kaiser HUD, D80E computer, PP12 display processors, Microturbo TGA15-328 APU
JAS 39A+ Batch 2 Upgraded single-seat fighter with PS-5/A radar and MACS D96 computer, monochrome cockpit displays
JAS 39B Two-seat operational trainer version of JAS 39A. Internal cannon deleted, fuselage lengthened by 2 ft 2 in (0.655 m), larger cckpit canopy, ventral air intake for air conditoning system. Prototype was a JAS 39A Batch 1 aircraft converted on the producton line.
JAS 39B Batch 2 Initial production version of two-seat operational trainer.
JAS 39C Batch 2 Export Baseline Standard single-seat fighters for Swedish AF. Mark 3 avionics: colour cockpit displays, Sundstrand APU
JAS 39C Batch 3 Follow-on Export Baseline Standard single-seat fighters for Swedish AF. Mark 4 avionics: much larger LCD colour cockpit displays, five MIL STD 1553B databuses, RM12UP engine with FADEC.
JAS 39D Batch 3 Follow-on batch of two-seat operational trainers.
JAS 39C/D SAAF Export Baseline Standard aircraft with substantial South African avionics and equipment for delivery to the SAAF.
JAS 39E/F Designation reserved for proposed upgraded version with an AESA electronically scanned radar.
JAS 39G/H Designation reserved for further upgraded version at some point in the future.
JAS 39X Generic designation for export version.
#14 Magnus
-
- +Senior Moderator
-
- 9,543 posts
GENERAL
Posted 29 May 2004 - 10:08 PM
IF IF IF i have money and iam incharge of PAF i will choose.
JAS-39E/F + Eireye AWACS System + Datalink
Enough to keep any enemy away from my airspace .
- All great ideas are simple. The trick is to see them before others.
- Vegre nem butulok tovabb (Finally I am becoming stupider no more) -the epitaph Paul Erdos wrote for himself
- "speak softly, but carry a big stick" - Chinese proverb
- History shows that there are no invincible armies and that there never have been- Stalin
- "Why does shame and self-loathing become cruelty to the innocent?"- Anne Rice
- “In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity.” Hunter S Thompson
#15 jawad2004
-
- Full Members
-



- 623 posts
MAJOR
Posted 29 May 2004 - 10:14 PM
but featuers he is takin r not available at this time
weapons?
#16 Jehangir
-
- Full Members
-




- 259 posts
COLONEL
- Interests:Sofware Development,Defence Articles.<br />Want Strongar Pakistan
- Location:Rawalpindi Pakistan
Posted 30 May 2004 - 06:17 AM
#17 omarxizt
-
- Senior Members
-





- 1,802 posts
BRIGADIER
Posted 30 May 2004 - 09:51 PM
China has to be the single most reliable partner we had and will have as far as defence is concerned. I am pretty sure that SA will have our back in diplomatic avenues as far as the royal family is in place. So keep the diplomatic ties within SA and then go after the high tech with China sounds like a winning plan to counter any threat level.
#18 Rahul
-
- Senior Members
-





- 1,193 posts
BRIGADIER
Posted 01 June 2004 - 02:59 AM
USA will only give economic assistance.
That leaves china.
Russia & Israel are with india.
This is not a dig at PAF despite wat people think.
ITS HARD COLD REALITY
#19 Kano
-
- Full Members
-




- 203 posts
COLONEL
Posted 01 June 2004 - 04:19 AM
Rahul, on Jun 1 2004, 02:59 AM, said:
USA will only give economic assistance.
That leaves china.
Russia & Israel are with india.
This is not a dig at PAF despite wat people think.
ITS HARD COLD REALITY
PAF will be recieving a huge sum of $12-15 dollars in the next 5 years to modernize its fleet.
Western hardware, chiefly Mirage 2000 series is obviously within its reach. PAF had concluded a deal for Mirage 2000-5's in 1996 what to talk of now.
Also it is the most suitable climate it has been in 2 decades, be it political or financial.
Just sit your Indian ass down to see PAF upgrade itself within the next few years.
Plus, diving falcon cheetay, TIGER-G AWACS? LOL will France make that no good obsolete AWACS for you? Tu bhi hadd karta hai yaar.
#20 Saqr
-
- Moderator
-
- 17,968 posts
GENERAL
- Gender:Male
- Location:Canada
Posted 01 June 2004 - 05:46 AM
Quote
Rahul, STFU!!!!!
Dude, I can kick your ass in a debate, fight, you name it, I'm there to do it, it's really easy to do so, but time consuming, unlike you, Sinopak, Lulldapull, who have waaay tooo much time on their hands, I have school...
However, for the sake of it, this one won't hurt me much...
Firstly, recieving 12-15bn US Dollars over the next 10 years isn't all that hard, see, that's like 1.2-1.5bn US Dollars a year in that timeline. However, have you forgotten that the PAF has 2.5bn US Dollars from ForEx since late 2003, add that up loser, meaning that the Government has like 9.5-12.5bn US Dollars to spend on the PAF over the next ten years.
Secondly, nowadays, with the economy improving, financial as well as political problems are very low compared to the 1990s, and right now France is pushing for the sale of Mirage 2000/-5/-5Mk2/-9 aircraft to the PAF, as well as more Agosta-90B Kits to the PN.
Thirdly, I'll be back, school!
#21 Desert Eagle2
-
- Senior Members
-





- 1,133 posts
BRIGADIER
Posted 01 June 2004 - 07:06 AM
In the running for PAF's choice of AWACS is either the Erieye AEW&C or the E-2C Hawkeye. From the rumblings that have been heard, it seems like the possibilities of the PAF receiving either are evenly split. Though I have heard some well informed PakDef members claim that Pakistan has been engaged in negotiations with the Swedes for the Erieye.
Ideally, I'd like to see the PAF purchase something like the Rafale or at least the Gripen (would go great coupled with the Erieye). But methinks the PAF is relatively set on the Mirage 2000-9. The J-10 will be exercised as an option of last resort, the PAF certainly does not want to put all its eggs in one basket (aka the Chinese) and the plane is not proven, not to mention I doubt it's avionics package will compare to anything western nations can churn out.
I'd say between 1 to 2 years we'll have a good/solid idea what the PAF will look like over the next decade or two, in the meanwhile we can keep guessing with obnoxious threads like this.
(btw, great to see Usmanali back on the forum)
He oiled himself like the soul of the olive.
He became glass of transparent hardness.
He studied to be a hurricane wind.
He fought himself until his blood was extinguished.
Only then was he worthy of his people.
"Canto General"
by Pablo Neruda
#22 Hataf
-
- Full Members
-




- 312 posts
COLONEL
- Location:UK
Posted 01 June 2004 - 02:03 PM
Jehangir, on May 30 2004, 06:17 AM, said:
let say we get his package, but which A2A missile are we gona use??? do you really think that USA will let us to use Aim 120C ....which is currently being used on JAS-39????????????????....stop dreaming & watch this reality show.................
Reality is
JF-17 + SD10
or
J10 + SD10
End of show. :hitwall
#23 leuitenentcolonel
-
- Senior Members
-





- 2,329 posts
BRIGADIER
- Gender:Male
- Location:Dubai
Posted 01 June 2004 - 03:52 PM
Hataf, on Jun 2 2004, 01:03 AM, said:
let say we get his package, but which A2A missile are we gona use??? do you really think that USA will let us to use Aim 120C ....which is currently being used on JAS-39????????????????....stop dreaming & watch this reality show.................
Reality is
JF-17 + SD10
or
J10 + SD10
End of show. :hitwall
THERE WOULD BE
FC1 WITH SD10
J10 WITH SD10 AND/OR MATRA
A50 OR Eireye AWACS System + Datalink
#24 leuitenentcolonel
-
- Senior Members
-





- 2,329 posts
BRIGADIER
- Gender:Male
- Location:Dubai
Posted 01 June 2004 - 03:54 PM
OR Pakistan WOULD GO FOR CHINESE ONLY LIKE FBC1A AND FBC1B I WISH ##### UKRAINE GIVE US THOSE SU27
#25 jawad2004
-
- Full Members
-



- 623 posts
MAJOR
Posted 01 June 2004 - 03:58 PM
Quote
PAF CAS said that they r in decision making phase.
Quote
O God these indians r realy funny
u might be tring to tell us the jok of the year
Quote
#26 USAM
-
- Senior Members
-





- 2,641 posts
BRIGADIER
Posted 01 June 2004 - 09:55 PM
#27 General
-
- Senior Members
-





- 1,577 posts
BRIGADIER
- Location:Malaysia
Posted 03 June 2004 - 09:11 PM
#28 Saad
-
- Senior Members
-





- 1,642 posts
BRIGADIER
- Interests:Military related stuff,material,news,etc.
- Location:Pakistan
Posted 05 June 2004 - 12:45 AM
Men at their best Pakistan Army
As long as we hope tomarrow awaits
"I'll be glad when we are no longer dependent on US aid".
Winston Churchill said in 1954
"Each time Paris was taken during last centuary,French resistance crumbled within an hour".
Charles de Gaulle wrote in 1934
#29 MAKAVELLI
-
- Banned
-




- 224 posts
COLONEL
Posted 05 June 2004 - 06:19 PM
so by 2010 PAF will be some what like this:
200~ JF17
80~ hightech Frontline fighters
60~ j10s
good SAMS and good ABM
and good survellance system such as AWACS and EWR
INSHALLAH :pkflg) :pkflg) :pkflg)
#30 mani395
-
- Full Members
-




- 234 posts
COLONEL
Posted 05 June 2004 - 08:50 PM
Quote
so by 2010 PAF will be some what like this:
200~ JF17
80~ hightech Frontline fighters
60~ j10s
good SAMS and good ABM
and good survellance system such as AWACS and EWR
INSHALLAH
last year news appeare on media(Hi Pakistan) that PAF Chief and other Defence related Peoples disscused the PAFs Plane of buing 400 fighters in a decades time.
#31 knight_warrior
-
- Full Members
-




- 151 posts
COLONEL
Posted 06 June 2004 - 05:09 AM
#32 tallyho
-
- Full Members
-


- 490 posts
CAPTAIN
Posted 06 June 2004 - 09:02 AM
Diving Falcon, on May 28 2004, 09:45 PM, said:
I think the PAF will go for the JAS-39E/F + Eireye + Datalink option as it is the cheapest Western Option (besides used F-16s and E-2s), not to mention the JAS-39E/F version won't host an American Engine and American parts (I think) it's then, a good option, however, the Swedes now get the final word.
#33 tank131
-
- Senior Members
-









- 2,919 posts
GENERAL
Posted 06 June 2004 - 02:14 PM
#34 leuitenentcolonel
-
- Senior Members
-





- 2,329 posts
BRIGADIER
- Gender:Male
- Location:Dubai
Posted 06 June 2004 - 02:20 PM
#35 oz281
-
- Full Members
-




- 209 posts
COLONEL
Posted 06 June 2004 - 04:58 PM
I wouldnt be surprised if a version of Mirage 2000 is inducted to plug the gaps !
Oz :hool:
Sol, our sun
Peace our mission
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Community Forum Software by IP.Board
Licensed to: PakistaniDefence.Com









